In general, the presumption rule pursuant to paragraph 1 requires that the taxable person has possession of at least two of the documents referred to in paragraph 3 and that these documents do not contradict each other, in terms of content.
If the taxable person initiates the transport to the purchaser, he can provide non-contradictory proof of the transport of the goods by means of e.g. a signed CMR bill of lading and a freight invoice. These two documents are required to be issued by two different third parties who are independent of both the taxable person and the purchaser. Alternatively, the taxable person can provide the necessary evidence using one of the aforementioned documents together with one of the following:
If, on the other hand, the purchaser arranges for the transport of goods (collection case), the taxable person also requires a written declaration from the purchaser that he has arranged for transport. The declaration must contain certain information, e.g. date and place of arrival of the goods, and it must also identify the person receiving the goods on behalf of the purchaser. It is thus very similar to the entry certificate currently required in Germany.
The provision does not contain a more precise statement as to how the tax authority can rebut the presumption of para 1.
3 Assessment
In principle, the creation of a uniform and Union-wide regulation on the requirements for documentary evidence should be viewed in a positive light. The current legal situation is, especially for companies exporting intra-Community supplies from several Member States, unsatisfactory and demanding. It is necessary to establish different verification processes for the individual countries on a regular basis and to keep them up to date in accordance with national jurisprudence and the changing view of the tax authorities. If this can be achieved, the current difficulties could be permanently overcome.
However, to date it remains unclear whether the new regulation is exclusive, in the sense of leaving no room for consideration of additional national regulations and requirements. It follows from the relevant legal material that the new regulation is based on the idea of unification. However, it does not follow from the wording of the provision itself that it is an exclusive regulation. So far, the German legislator has not positioned itself as to whether the regulations on documentary evidence in the German VAT Implementing Regulation will continue to apply after 1 January 2020 and what relationship they will have in terms of the new regulation. A short-term adjustment of the business process may, once again, be necessary.
Irrespective of this question, it can be assumed that the requirements for collecting and retaining documentary evidence will continue to increase in the future. Thus, the administrative burden on companies wanting to ensure zero-rating for intra-Community supplies will continue to be heavy. It is particularly regrettable that the provision does not contain any concrete requirements on how tax authorities can rebut the presumption rule. This represents an enormous potential risk for companies and a missed opportunity for the legislator to restore proportionality in this field.
Contact:
Dr. Christian Salder
Lawyer, Certified tax consultant
Phone: +49 89 217501285
christian.salder@kmlz.de
As per: 14.01.2019